You know you're overspending on Google Cloud. But when you search for cost optimization tools, everything seems designed for enterprises—complex implementations, lengthy sales cycles, and pricing that assumes a dedicated FinOps team.
What about growing companies? Startups, scale-ups, and teams that need results without the overhead?
This guide compares GCP cost optimization tools through that lens. We'll cover what works for companies that don't have six months to implement a solution or a dedicated cloud cost analyst.
The Problem with Enterprise Tools
Before diving into options, let's acknowledge why most "best tools" lists don't help growing companies:
- Enterprise pricing: Many tools don't publish pricing. That usually means expensive.
- Complex implementations: 30-90 day onboarding projects aren't realistic for lean teams.
- Multi-cloud focus: You're on GCP. You don't need AWS and Azure features you won't use.
- Feature overload: Governance, compliance, showback—features for large organizations, not growing teams.
- Quick setup (hours, not months)
- Clear visibility into where money goes
- Actionable recommendations (not just dashboards)
- Straightforward pricing
Category 1: Native GCP Tools (Free)
Start here. These tools cost nothing and give you a baseline.
GCP Console Billing Reports
What it does: Basic cost visibility in the Google Cloud Console.
Pros:
- Free
- No setup required
- Official Google data
Cons:
- Summary-level only—hard to drill down
- No recommendations
- One billing account at a time
- Limited historical analysis
Best for: Getting started, basic cost awareness.
How to access: Console → Billing → Reports
Google Cloud Recommender
What it does: ML-powered suggestions for cost optimization, security, and performance.
Pros:
- Free
- Automated suggestions
- Covers idle resources, right-sizing, commitments
Cons:
- Must check manually (no alerts)
- Recommendations can be generic
- Limited context on business impact
Best for: Regular (weekly) audits of obvious waste.
How to access: Console → IAM & Admin → Recommendations
Common recommendations:
- Idle VM instances (unused 14+ days)
- Oversized instances (CPU utilization below threshold)
- Unattached persistent disks
- Idle Cloud SQL instances
Cloud Billing Export to BigQuery
What it does: Exports detailed billing data to BigQuery for custom analysis.
Pros:
- Free (minimal BigQuery storage costs)
- Complete billing data access
- Enables custom dashboards and queries
Cons:
- Requires SQL knowledge
- You build everything yourself
- Data NOT retroactive—enable early!
- No built-in recommendations
Best for: Teams with SQL skills who want complete flexibility.
Important: If you haven't enabled billing export yet, do it now. You only get data from the day you enable it forward.
GCP FinOps Hub (Preview)
What it does: Google's newer cost management interface with cost insights.
Pros:
- Free
- Native integration
- Better visualizations than legacy billing
Cons:
- Still relatively new
- Limited features compared to third-party tools
- Single billing account view
Best for: Companies wanting to stay within GCP ecosystem.
Native Tools Summary
| Tool | Setup Time | SQL Required | Recommendations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Billing Reports | None | No | No |
| Recommender | None | No | Yes (manual check) |
| BigQuery Export | 1-2 hours | Yes | No |
| FinOps Hub | None | No | Basic |
Category 2: SMB-Friendly Third-Party Tools
These tools fill gaps that native GCP tools leave.
Brain Agents AI
What it does: GCP cost optimization specifically for growing companies. Aggregates costs across multiple billing accounts, provides actionable recommendations, and tracks optimization progress.
Pros:
- Multi-billing-account view (see all your GCP costs in one place)
- Actionable recommendations with clear savings estimates
- Built specifically for GCP (deep integration, not multi-cloud afterthought)
- Quick setup (connect via service account, not lengthy implementation)
- Affordable pricing for growing companies
Cons:
- GCP-only (not for multi-cloud environments)
- Newer product (less market presence than enterprise tools)
Best for: Growing companies on GCP who need visibility across multiple billing accounts and actionable recommendations without enterprise complexity.
Website: brainagents.ai/gcpfinops
Infracost
What it does: Shows cloud cost estimates for infrastructure-as-code (Terraform, Pulumi, etc.) before you deploy.
Pros:
- Free tier available
- Integrates with CI/CD pipelines
- Prevents cost surprises before deployment
- Open-source option
Cons:
- Focused on IaC—not existing resources
- Doesn't optimize current spend
- Requires IaC adoption
Best for: Teams using Terraform who want to catch cost issues in pull requests.
Website: infracost.io
Cloud Custodian
What it does: Open-source tool for policy-based cloud management. Automates cleanup of resources based on rules.
Pros:
- Free (open source)
- Powerful automation capabilities
- Can auto-delete/stop idle resources
- Active community
Cons:
- Requires YAML policy writing
- Steeper learning curve
- You manage infrastructure
- No recommendations—you define the rules
Best for: Engineering teams comfortable with config-as-code who want automated enforcement.
GitHub: github.com/cloud-custodian/cloud-custodian
SMB-Friendly Tools Summary
| Tool | Focus | Multi-Billing | Recommendations | Learning Curve |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brain Agents AI | GCP Cost Visibility | Yes | Yes | Low |
| Infracost | IaC Cost Prevention | N/A | Pre-deploy | Medium |
| Cloud Custodian | Policy Automation | No | No (rules-based) | High |
Category 3: Mid-Market Tools
These tools work for growing companies but are designed for larger teams.
CAST AI
What it does: Kubernetes cost optimization with automated right-sizing and spot instance management.
Pros:
- Significant K8s cost savings (claims up to 75%)
- Automated optimization
- Multi-cloud support
Cons:
- K8s-focused only
- Complexity for small clusters
- Requires Kubernetes expertise
Best for: Companies with significant Kubernetes workloads on GCP (GKE).
Kubecost
What it does: Kubernetes cost monitoring and allocation.
Pros:
- Free tier (single cluster)
- K8s-native cost allocation
- Showback/chargeback capabilities
Cons:
- Only for Kubernetes
- Enterprise features need paid tier
- Complex for small teams
Best for: Teams needing K8s cost allocation by namespace, deployment, or team.
Category 4: Enterprise Tools (Why They Don't Fit)
These are excellent products—for large organizations. Here's why they're typically overkill for growing companies:
CloudHealth (VMware)
- Enterprise pricing (typically starts at thousands per month)
- 60+ day implementation
- Multi-cloud governance focus
- Requires dedicated admin
Apptio Cloudability
- Enterprise sales process
- Complex onboarding
- Built for FinOps teams
- Feature set exceeds growing company needs
Spot.io (NetApp)
- Enterprise-focused
- Complex integrations
- Pricing through sales
- Designed for large-scale compute optimization
Harness Cloud Cost Management
- Part of larger DevOps platform
- Enterprise pricing
- Requires platform adoption
Decision Framework: Which Tool Should You Choose?
Start Here: Everyone
- Enable Billing Export to BigQuery (free, do it now)
- Check Recommender weekly (free, 10 minutes)
- Set up budget alerts (free, prevents surprises)
Then Choose Based on Your Situation
If you have multiple GCP billing accounts:
→ You need a tool that aggregates them. Native GCP tools don't do this well. Consider Brain Agents AI.
If you use Infrastructure as Code (Terraform):
→ Add Infracost to your CI/CD pipeline to catch costs before deployment.
If you have significant Kubernetes workloads:
→ Evaluate Kubecost (free tier) or CAST AI for K8s-specific optimization.
If you want automated policy enforcement:
→ Cloud Custodian lets you auto-delete idle resources based on rules.
If your needs are simple:
→ Native GCP tools plus monthly manual audits may be enough.
Common Questions
"Can I just use native GCP tools?"
Yes, if:
- You have one billing account
- You have SQL skills for BigQuery analysis
- You're disciplined about weekly Recommender checks
- Your optimization needs are straightforward
Native tools work but require more manual effort.
"What about cost management from my cloud provider?"
GCP's native tools are improving (FinOps Hub), but they're still basic compared to specialized tools. They also can't provide a view across multiple billing accounts.
"Should I wait for a dedicated FinOps hire?"
No. Basic cost optimization doesn't require a specialist. Start with native tools and simple third-party solutions. Hire a specialist when your cloud spend and complexity justify it.
"How much should I expect to save?"
Most companies can reduce GCP spend by 20-40% through:
- Eliminating idle resources (5-15%)
- Right-sizing instances (10-20%)
- Commitment strategies (20-50% on committed workloads)
The right tool helps you find and act on these savings faster.
Implementation Checklist
Week 1:
- [ ] Enable billing export to BigQuery
- [ ] Set budget alerts at 50%, 90%, 100%
- [ ] Review Recommender for low-hanging fruit
Week 2:
- [ ] Audit current resources for obvious waste
- [ ] Implement labels for cost tracking
- [ ] Evaluate third-party tools based on needs
Week 3+:
- [ ] Implement chosen tool(s)
- [ ] Establish monthly review cadence
- [ ] Track savings over time
Key Takeaways
- Start with native tools—they're free and provide a foundation
- Billing export is non-negotiable—enable it now (not retroactive)
- Multi-billing-account visibility is a common gap native tools don't solve
- Enterprise tools are overkill for most growing companies
- Consistency matters more than tools—weekly reviews beat expensive dashboards
Need multi-billing-account visibility with actionable recommendations? Brain Agents AI helps growing companies see all their GCP costs in one place.
Related Articles: